PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AUMN vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


AUMN^GSPC
YTD Return-35.89%25.45%
1Y Return-31.28%35.64%
3Y Return (Ann)-70.01%8.55%
5Y Return (Ann)-42.89%14.13%
10Y Return (Ann)-32.23%11.39%
Sharpe Ratio-0.312.90
Sortino Ratio0.223.87
Omega Ratio1.031.54
Calmar Ratio-0.324.19
Martin Ratio-0.7718.72
Ulcer Index41.91%1.90%
Daily Std Dev102.86%12.27%
Max Drawdown-99.97%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-99.95%-0.29%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between AUMN and ^GSPC is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

AUMN vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AUMN achieves a -35.89% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 25.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AUMN has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of -32.23%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-32.94%
14.05%
AUMN
^GSPC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AUMN vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUMN
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AUMN, currently valued at -0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AUMN, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.22
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AUMN, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.03
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AUMN, currently valued at -0.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.32
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AUMN, currently valued at -0.77, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.77
^GSPC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.54
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 4.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.19
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^GSPC, currently valued at 18.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0018.72

AUMN vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUMN Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUMN and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.31
2.90
AUMN
^GSPC

Drawdowns

AUMN vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUMN drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUMN and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-99.95%
-0.29%
AUMN
^GSPC

Volatility

AUMN vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Golden Minerals Company (AUMN) has a higher volatility of 32.55% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.86%. This indicates that AUMN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
32.55%
3.86%
AUMN
^GSPC